photoPC

Ask us to port a specific application.

photoPC

Postby ururk » Tue Apr 02, 2002 2:59 pm

Can anyone give me assistance in porting this to Mac OSX? Or, can anyone do this.

Thanks!

PS, had to edit this as I forgot:

http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/photopc/photopc-3.05.tar.gz

this link.

[ April 02, 2002: Message edited by: John ]</p>
ururk
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:00 pm

Re: photoPC

Postby orange1 » Thu Apr 04, 2002 4:56 pm

it seems to configure and compile with no errors for me. only step i didn't do was `make install`
did you have problems compiling?
--
-willy
Freedom will henceforth be compulsory. -Random Party Manifesto
orange1
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 7:00 pm

Re: photoPC

Postby ururk » Thu Apr 04, 2002 5:03 pm

Could you email me? I guess I need some help...ururk at mac.com

Thanks!
ururk
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:00 pm

Re: photoPC

Postby ururk » Sat Apr 06, 2002 4:59 pm

I do not have project builder, is this required?

Thanks!
ururk
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:00 pm

Re: photoPC

Postby ururk » Tue Apr 09, 2002 4:09 pm

THis is what I get, can I go along wiht a make install, or will it screw up my system? AM I missing anyhting?

[wcc2-122:~/desktop/compiled/photopc-3.05] triffid% ./configure
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for working aclocal... missing
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake... missing
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... missing
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... cc
checking whether the C compiler (cc ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (cc ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E -traditional-cpp
checking for function prototypes... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes
checking for echo... /bin/echo
checking for ln... /bin/ln
checking for mv... /bin/mv
checking for rm... /bin/rm
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for ar... /usr/bin/ar
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for fcntl.h... yes
checking for sys/time.h... yes
checking for sys/select.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for sched.h... yes
checking for termios.h... yes
checking for termio.h... no
checking for sgtty.h... yes
checking for utime.h... yes
checking for sys/utime.h... no
checking for signal.h... yes
checking for working const... yes
checking for off_t... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h
checking return type of signal handlers... void
checking for restartable system calls... yes
checking whether struct tm has tm_gmtoff... yes
checking whether struct utimbuf is defined... yes
checking whether optarg is defined in headers... yes
checking size of short... 2
checking size of int... 4
checking size of long... 4
checking for rename... yes
checking for mkdir... yes
checking for strerror... yes
checking for strspn... yes
checking for select... yes
checking for uname... yes
checking for cfmakeraw... yes
checking for sched_setscheduler... no
checking for nanosleep... yes
checking for snooze... no
checking for vprintf... yes
checking for strftime... yes
checking for usleep... yes
checking for getopt... yes
checking for strcasecmp... yes
updating cache ./config.cache
creating ./config.status
creating Makefile
creating config.h
creating dos/version.h
dos/version.h is unchanged
creating win32/version.h
win32/version.h is unchanged
[wcc2-122:~/desktop/compiled/photopc-3.05] triffid% make
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c eph_read.c
eph_read.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c eph_iob.c
eph_iob.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c eph_err.c
eph_err.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c eph_cmd.c
eph_cmd.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c eph_io.c
eph_io.c: In function `shortsleep':
eph_io.c:146: warning: implicit declaration of function `nanosleep'
eph_io.c: At top level:
eph_io.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c eph_open.c
eph_open.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
rm -f libeph_io.a
/usr/bin/ar cru libeph_io.a eph_read.o eph_iob.o eph_err.o eph_cmd.o eph_io.o eph_open.o
ranlib libeph_io.a
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c photopc.c
photopc.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c a12scan.c
a12scan.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c fnames.c
fnames.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c ctimez.c
ctimez.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c filetime.c
filetime.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c exifscan.c
exifscan.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -g -O2 -Wall -o photopc photopc.o a12scan.o fnames.o ctimez.o filetime.o exifscan.o libeph_io.a
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I./dos -I./win32 -g -O2 -Wall -c epinfo.c
epinfo.c:2: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used
cc -g -O2 -Wall -o epinfo epinfo.o a12scan.o exifscan.o fnames.o ctimez.o filetime.o
[wcc2-122:~/desktop/compiled/photopc-3.05] triffid%
ururk
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:00 pm

Re: photoPC

Postby orange1 » Wed Apr 10, 2002 5:10 pm

looks fine. bunch of useless warnings, is all.
i'd say go ahead and install. it's not gonna hurt the system. worst thing that'll happen is it'll copy over a couple of binaries that don't work like they should.
--
-willy
Freedom will henceforth be compulsory. -Random Party Manifesto
orange1
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 7:00 pm


Return to Requests

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests

cron